<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Noots&#8217; Notes Game 11:  36-10 Loss at Minnesota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nootsnotes.com/2009/11/30/noots-notes-game-11-36-10-loss-at-minnesota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nootsnotes.com/2009/11/30/noots-notes-game-11-36-10-loss-at-minnesota/</link>
	<description>All you need to know about Bears Football!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh U.Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nootsnotes.com/2009/11/30/noots-notes-game-11-36-10-loss-at-minnesota/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh U.Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nootsnotes.com/?p=126#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I think the predictable runs into the middle on 3 and 1 sum up the unimaginative offense   all stopped ,of course .The same play was used on first down after Knox&#039;s great runback. I noticed that Cutler was more a drop back quarterback than mobile---with predictable results. Vikings on the other hand had great runs to the outside including end arounds and toss outs to Percy H. Favre was more mobile ,as well,to the outside than Cutler. Why did the Bears  new runner not get used more?One run only ? I notice also that the 2 Vikings runners were used in a much more alternating style.Gives a change of pace etc. Why the Bears hate outside runs and throw the ball only to outside receivers who dont get close to or past the first down marker is a thing I dont understand. Your review of the game and the consequent ratings is so accurate. To think that negative results broke several records or hadnt been seen in decades says it all.You were so right to give coaching an F. The amount of rebuilding needed for this team will  take a few wasted years---if it is done at all.Keep up the good work and forgive my long rant.Leigh(fan from Canada)Btw,really just enjoyed watching the Grey Cup game from Calgary.Good ball and a one point victory for Montreal over Saskatchewan on the final play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the predictable runs into the middle on 3 and 1 sum up the unimaginative offense   all stopped ,of course .The same play was used on first down after Knox&#8217;s great runback. I noticed that Cutler was more a drop back quarterback than mobile&#8212;with predictable results. Vikings on the other hand had great runs to the outside including end arounds and toss outs to Percy H. Favre was more mobile ,as well,to the outside than Cutler. Why did the Bears  new runner not get used more?One run only ? I notice also that the 2 Vikings runners were used in a much more alternating style.Gives a change of pace etc. Why the Bears hate outside runs and throw the ball only to outside receivers who dont get close to or past the first down marker is a thing I dont understand. Your review of the game and the consequent ratings is so accurate. To think that negative results broke several records or hadnt been seen in decades says it all.You were so right to give coaching an F. The amount of rebuilding needed for this team will  take a few wasted years&#8212;if it is done at all.Keep up the good work and forgive my long rant.Leigh(fan from Canada)Btw,really just enjoyed watching the Grey Cup game from Calgary.Good ball and a one point victory for Montreal over Saskatchewan on the final play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

